The Lobster Quadrille (calamarimonster) wrote in debate_corner,
The Lobster Quadrille
calamarimonster
debate_corner

*Insert Meat Reference Here*

1)Well that's peachy. I don't care.

2)I'll take your challenge when you start taking mine

3)Of course we're smarter than monkeys. Apes are higher on the evolutionary scale. And I really don't think much of the human race. The similarities between us and lower primates is startling.

4)Maybe not, but you brought up the point of nessascity, and it was my job to show how little that matters to us.

5)Jerky.

6)Yes. Yes Lindsay, because it's "just a fish", that makes it pain less important. If I tied a human to a chair and a fish to another chair, and started cutting them slowly, you'd let the human go first. That's common sense.

7)I don't know. Never said I did, just said I assumed there were some.

8)So we're agreed then, splendid.

9)I'm no expert, but I know a bit more than the laymen. And this is me we're referring to, you know it takes a lot more than scare tactics to sway me.

10)Irrelivant. A lot of things cause Cancer, and hey, something's got to kill you, may as well be something you enjoy. And no, that's not to say I'd enjoy cancer, just I'd prefer meat kills me, as opposed to a mack truck.

11)Yeah, and the rich eat well. And as for the numbers, well that's why they're random silly.

12)It would. Now if only those regulations affected me I'd hop on the bandwagon.

14)I rasied several. Most of them were smaller, placed in the attacks on your points, but there were several there, take your pick

Yes, but it's not happening to people. And so what if we play God? We're both atheists here so that term means almost nothing, and if we don't believe in God, then there is absolutely no reason not to play it, if it's for the betterment of Glorified Apekind.

And also, I asked you for proof in about three different spots, and you didn't even mention that to tell me that you wouldn't. Either admit you're making things up, or give me my evidence.

And I may as well throw in a new point, what the hell.
These creatures are grown for the strict purpose of feeding us. They don't think, they react by instinct.
They don't have emotion, that too is a type of instinct in them.
They are mindless pieces of meat.
A society without art is not an intelligent society.
Therefore the cow civilization is, believe it or not, below us.
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 9 comments
Andrew i am sorry to say but dude, you are
ignoring half of the points she brought up.
Jerky?
You better start coming up with actual points, other then
They are below us. and your own personal views on pain, and the pain of other things.

You also are, about 2 steps away from being racist. Keep those 2 steps back.


Not much i can say else, with out helping lyndsay out
Well now first of all, where in the hell am I being racist??? Or this another Hitler thing?
And secondly, stay out of it.
Then act it.
Sit back and do your job, and stay out of the debate, or I'll have that title revoked from under you so fast you'll never stop spinning.
You better start arguing against lyndsay and not me, cause well, I'll kick you out of this debate so fast that you'll never stop spinning.
Actually, when planning the rules I was smart enough to make sure you didn't have that kind of power.
The key to genius is planning ahead.
You cannot use the argument of animal emotion
unless
one of you can PROVE either way,
cause i don't agree with
"Animals do feel emotion"
and
"Animals are rocks, their brains only move their bodies"

So please i DEMAND PROOF or the complete disregard for that whole area completely.


See andrew i do crack down on Lyndsay too.
In a double sweep, of course.
But it was more of a problem for lyndsay now isn't it, seeing as Animal equality is a big part of her argument.
A small part of yours